Skip to main content

Local cryptoeconomies

Who decides how the economy of a city or country works? Upon which standards is the money supply controlled and defined?

While most are thinking that the economy is now global and what happens in one part of the world affects the other, I choose to think that economies should be allowed to exist on a micro scale rather than the macro one we see now. The price of milk and bread in Zimbabwe cannot and should not correlate into the economic crisis of the Euro or the Dollar. We may not continue to allow these globalist currencies to consume the consumer.

We need to decentralize.

Many are, in my opinion, making the mistake of thinking of bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency as a global one. While it may be true that it can be traded into a global level, don't be so sure that 1 bitcoin in Tokyo is worth the same as one bitcoin in Athens.

Those who propose that one cryptocurrency should rule them all should stop and think about how that affects not only the people, but the cryptocurrency itself. As a matter of fact, it is when there are many cryptocurrencies that the economy is healthier. When each locality uses their own currency to trade within their own economy, the currency is allowed to flourish as it is automatically adjusted and given value based on that specific economy.

The real beauty of this however, is that when the people of said locality want to trade with others outside of their local economy, they can continue to receive their own currency worldwide! This is the true miracle of cryptocurrency on the economic level. It allows you to use whichever currency is more economically valuable to you.

So go on, create alternative digital coinage for all tastes and adapt to whichever local economy you choose. When people find that a coin fits their economy better they'll use it, otherwise it will be discarded until the proper one is discovered.



Popular posts from this blog

If Bitcoin is better than fiat why is adoption slow?

Bitcoin adoption is not slow. On the contrary a few million people use it just after 9 years after it was introduced. The people actually love the idea of Bitcoin, but they're scared to have to store Bitcoin for themselves. Even with all the bank scandals in the world, even with the Cyprus haircut and the Greek capital controls, the people still prefer to have the bank handle their money.

In a sort of sense they are right. It is difficult to handle fiat currency safely and securely. If one has $50,000 in savings, it's not considered the safest bet to store them at home, even in an unbreachable vault. For what it's worth, for $50,000 thieves are willing to break the wall surrounding the vault and carry the entire vault with them until they can find a way to open it. Similarly, the other kind of thieves -banks and politicians-, can simply pass a law that decides that all deposits bigger than $5,000 will be used to bailout the bank institutions or the government. Magically i…

The Bitcoin white paper before Satoshi decided to call it "Bitcoin"

The below is probably not the original PDF, however it contains what I and a few others consider to be the original writing (based on review from Wei Dai possibly).

Edit: As confirmed by Gwern this document's source is from another fake Satoshi. As it was emailed to me anonymously from someone that keeps sending me stuff like this anonymously (possibly an encounter I had on a forum or mailing list), the best source to verify such a document would be from the people who have already done some research on this. Have a read on Gwern's page about the ecash.pdf document and the Nakamot/Dai emails

Electricity, a real currency

Value is a strange thing. What do humans really value? Food? Housing? Clothes? Well, of course those things have intrinsic value as we need them to survive. But to have an economy you can't rely on food or other items required for survival as once they're spent, they're spent forever. We need something which can be spent for good but produce something which can stay in circulation forever, or at least for quite a long time. We also need something that cannot be easily destroyed, cannot be forged and is easily identifiable as the item in question. Most importantly, we need something which humans identify as truly valuable. Thus, this something should also be able to be used for other purposes, without removing value from the a potential byproduct which may have the qualities mentioned and can be used as money.

For centuries, this concept has found refuge in precious, or rather let's call it rare, metals. Silver, platinum, gold and many others, with the most valuable be…